Relationen des Wismarer Obergerichts 1729
Show full title
0029
Abt. VI. Rep. 3. C Relationen des Obergerichts
Relationen des Obergerichts >> 01. Gesamte Archivalien
1729
Elisabeth Stadlander contra Johann Lehmann in pto debiti. - Concurs und Substitationssachen des Daniel Tillens Witwe und Erben. - Friedrich Siegels Witwe contra Joachim Allers und Thomas Gesterding in pto eine Schuldforderung und dessen Schreibung zu Stadtbuche. - Die Witwe des Stadt Major Laschen contra die Lieutnannin Zvirre in pto fatel non testamenti. - Concurs und Substitationssachen von Catharina Kirchhoff. - Concurs und Substitationssachen von Claus Barten. - Concurs und Substitationssachen von Jürgen Robens Erben. - Concurs und Substitationssachen von Daniel Pentzins Erben. - Concurs und Substitationssachen von David Hinrich Schaden. - Josio Matrasse contra Martin Hinrich Haaren in pto contradictionis. - Joachim Hinrich Müller, Amtmann zu Mecklenburgs Witwe und Erben contra David Draguhn in pto debiti. - Niclas Anton Hertzberg contra Hermann Caspar Voigt in pto damni. - Johan Leonhard Baggen contra Benedict Burenais Witwe in pto debiti. - Elisabeth Stadtländer contra Johann Lehmann in pto debiti. - Die Vormünder der Kinder von Johann Sass contra Lorentz Frahm in pto hereditatis paternae. - Martin Scheffel contra Christian Diederich Alberti in pto anvertrauter Sache
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
29.10.2025, 11:28 AM CET
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International