In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Mandatum de solvendo Auseinandersetzung um die Bezahlung von Schulden
Wismarer Tribunal >> 01. Prozeßakten >> 01.19. 1. Kläger S
(1783-1786) 20.11.1786-25.01.1787
Kläger: (2) Balthasar Gustav von Sander, ehemaliger Assessor am Tribunal, namens seiner Ehefrau
Beklagter: Immanuel von Gentzkow
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Johann Christian Koch (A & P)
Fallbeschreibung: Im Jahre 1782 hat die Frau Sanders das Erbe Friedrich Stievelebens angetreten, zu dem auch eine Obligation der Schwester Genzukows, der Witwe von Glöden, über 170 Rtlr aus dem Jahre 1765 gehört. Von der Obligation exisitiert nur noch eine beglaubigte Abschrift, das Original ist in einem anderen Prozeß verlorengegangen. Der Kl. bittet um Anweisung an den Bekl. zur Bezahlung der Schuld inkl. Zinsen mit der nächsten Rate. Das Tribunal verweist den Kl. am 09.01. auf das am selben Tag ergangene Urteil, das Sander auffordert, die Originalverschreibung beizubringen oder diese gerichtlich ungültig machen zu lassen. Am 25.01. erneuert der Kl. seine Bitte das Hofgericht anzuweisen, die dort befindliche Kopie in beglaubigter Form an ihn auszuliefern, damit seine Ehefrau baldmöglichst zu ihrem Geld komme und belegt den Verlust des Originals. Das Tribunal erkennt die Forderung an, belegt sie aber wegen der Forderung des Kammerrates von Reichenbach mit Beschlag.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1786-1787
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Aussage des Stralsunder Landrates J.A. Dinnies vom 11.10.1786; Brief des Greifswalder Konsistorialsekretärs Magnus Rehfeld an den Kl. vom 15.05.1783; Aussagen der Sophia von Glöden, geb. v. Gentzkow vom 16.01.1787 und des Bekl. vom 16.01.1787, des Greifswalder Ratsherrn Meyer vom 22.01.1787
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
