Vergleich zwischen Martin Brücklein und Thomas Wild, beide als Pfleger zu Pettstadt, gegen Thomas Ruppenbach und Georg Dotterweich, beide Michelsberger Hofbauern zu Rattelshof, in der Differenz um die Ecksteinsetzung bei einer Wiese genannt "die Heyligenwisen" und bei einer Wiese genannt "die Schubernwisen" "neben der Ebrach" zu Rattelshof (Konzept).

Show full title
Staatsarchiv Bamberg
Vergleich zwischen Martin Brücklein und Thomas Wild, beide als Pfleger zu Pettstadt, gegen Thomas Ruppenbach und Georg Dotterweich, beide Michelsberger Hofbauern zu Rattelshof, in der Differenz um die Ecksteinsetzung bei einer Wiese genannt "die Heyligenwisen" und bei einer Wiese genannt "die Schubernwisen" "neben der Ebrach" zu Rattelshof (Konzept).
Kloster Michelsberg, Akten und Bände Nr. 800
B 110, Nr. 1322
Kloster Michelsberg, Akten und Bände
Kloster Michelsberg, Akten und Bände >> Aktenplan, Kloster Michelsberg, Akten und Bände >> 6. Ausübung der Lehensherrschaft >> 6.2 Lehenakten >> 6.2.3 Kanzleimann- und -zinslehen >> 6.2.3.1 Lehen in direkter Verwaltung der Klosterkanzlei >> 6.2.3.1.2 Lehen in der Bamberger Umgebung
1620 VIII 11
Akten
deutsch
Brücklein, Martin, Pettstadt (Lk Bamberg)
Pettstadt (Lk Bamberg), Brücklein Martin
Wild, Thomas, Pettstadt (Lk Bamberg)
Pettstadt (Lk Bamberg), Wild Thomas
Ruppenbach, Thomas, Rattelshof (Lk Bamberg)
Rattelshof (Lk Bamberg), Ruppenbach Thomas
Dotterweich, Georg, Rattelshof (Lk Bamberg)
Rattelshof (Lk Bamberg), Dotterweich Georg
Rattelshof (Lk Bamberg)
Bamberg, Kloster Michelsberg

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
15.04.2025, 3:32 PM CEST
Staatsarchiv Bamberg

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Staatsarchiv Bamberg