In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Testament der Witwe Wrede, geb. Alheid Schedelich (Rotenburg, bei St. Ilienkirchhof) vom 24. Mai 1610, verkündet am 4. Juli 1616.
Darin: 31.5.1613, Kodizill. Aus ihrem Nachlass soll ein Armenhaus in Dülmen, worin 3 Arme wohnen können, gestiftet und Wreden-Armenhaus genannt werden. Zeugen: Hans Hase, Goldschmied, und Joest Krechter, Kramer. Notar: Johan Niehaus.
Enthält: Vermächtnisse erhalten 1. das weiland Dr. Vents Armenhaus (u. zwar Rentbrief auf Rudolf von Exsen zum Alvinghoffe, 2. das Armenhaus zu Dülmen, der Hl. Geist genannt, 3. die Geschwister Godthardt, Everdt und Elsken Borchardt in Dülmen, Kinder ihrer Schwester (u. zwar einen Brief auf Nagell zur Keuschenburg), 4. Godfrid von Heiden, Rentmeister zur Cloppenborg, dessen Frau Katharina Wrede und dessen Kinder: a. Kaspar von Heiden, Pate ihres + Sohnes Kaspar Wrede, b. Adolf von Heiden, Richter zu Essen, c. Enneken von Heiden, Frau Bernd Duvel, d. Fretke [?] von Heiden, e. Gertrud von Heiden (u. zwar einen Rentbrief aus den Palsterkampschen Gütern, den jetzt mit 20 Th. Bertram von Lohe schuldet). Als Erben werden eingesetzt die 3 Borchardts Kinder und die Frau Rentmeister von Heiden. Zu Testamentsvollstreckern werden ernannt a. Henrich Hovell [?], Probst zu St. Ilien, b. Prokurator Johan zur Lippe, c. Johan Hollenhorst, Essenscher Amtmann. Zeugen: Peter Hundepoell und Johan von Werne. Von Rats wegen: Thomas Egbers. Notar: Melchior Menke.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
