1455 November 21. Vor Johann Steman, geschw. Richter der Edelherren Bernhard [VII.] und Simon und der Stadt Lemgo: Urfehde des Matheus Fele (oder Sele?). Bürgen: die Lemgoer Bürger Johan Meyger tor Sulte; Hans Rikeman; Engelke Pelser; Hans Kerchoff; Henrik Michael; Hermen Clawesing; Henneke Wittikehoff; Everd Lohman; Ludeke Michel; Hans Koler; Peter Bentenbergh; Hermen Sultemeyger; Ludeke Luninch. Bei Bruch der Urfehde Sühnzahlung von 42 rh. Gulden. Zeugen: Ludolff van Impteshusen und Diderik van Bruning (?)
Show full title
1455 November 21. Vor Johann Steman, geschw. Richter der Edelherren Bernhard [VII.] und Simon und der Stadt Lemgo: Urfehde des Matheus Fele (oder Sele?). Bürgen: die Lemgoer Bürger Johan Meyger tor Sulte; Hans Rikeman; Engelke Pelser; Hans Kerchoff; Henrik Michael; Hermen Clawesing; Henneke Wittikehoff; Everd Lohman; Ludeke Michel; Hans Koler; Peter Bentenbergh; Hermen Sultemeyger; Ludeke Luninch. Bei Bruch der Urfehde Sühnzahlung von 42 rh. Gulden. Zeugen: Ludolff van Impteshusen und Diderik van Bruning (?)
01.01.01 U, U_0551
01.01.01 U [S 1] 01 Urkunden
[S 1] 01 Urkunden >> 01 Stadt Lemgo (Alt- und Neustadt) - Haupturkundenarchiv >> Urkunden 1451 - 1500
1455.11.21
Schlagwort: Urfehden
Enthält: Ausf., Perg., dt., 3 Sgg. angeh.,1) Joh. Stenman, 2) Ludolf von Impteshausen 3) ab, Hoppe (Transkription)
Enthält: Ausf., Perg., dt., 3 Sgg. angeh.,1) Joh. Stenman, 2) Ludolf von Impteshausen 3) ab, Hoppe (Transkription)
Stadt Lemgo (Alt- und Neustadt)
Archivale
Aussteller: Urkundenaussteller: Stadtrichter
1455
Bentenbergh
Bernhard
Bruch
Bruning
Bürgen
Bürger
Clawesing
Diderik
Edelherren
Engelke
Everd
Fele
Gulden
Hans
Henneke
Henrik
Hermen
Impteshusen
Johan
Johann
Kerchoff
Koler
Lemgo
Lemgoer
Lohman
Ludeke
Ludolff
Luninch
Matheus
Meyger
Michael
Michel
November
Pelser
Peter
Richter
Rikeman
Sele
Simon
Stadt
Steman
Sühnzahlung
Sulte
Sultemeyger
Urfehde
VII
Wittikehoff
Zeugen
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
09.01.2026, 12:27 PM CET
Public Domain Mark 1.0 Universal